← Gallery

How far does it travel? — national transport

PROTOTYPE PRESENT BURDEN
Map shows
100 km ring
Rate — deaths per 100k people per year
Count — attributable deaths per year, per receptor cell
⚠ Big cells, big patches — see legend.
Building receptor raster…

Honesty ledger — assumptions & limits

This is a lower bound on transport: A single-layer, ground-level annual-average SR response under-represents long-range transport, so every "share of burden far from source" figure here is conservative — the real spread is wider, not narrower. For the same reason there is deliberately no wind-rose or directional plot on this page: the matrix is an annual average and does not resolve direction.
Distance is to the NEAREST source cell, which is the honest cheap metric and also its own limitation: a far cell is often downwind of many sources at once, and gets filed under its closest one. The bands describe geometry, not attribution.
Present burden, not a repeal forecast: this page shows what the currently-operating US coal plants' real 2025 emissions contribute today. The separately-labelled §111-repeal delta scenario lives on the national tile, not here.
Nearest-centroid raster (MAUP):
y0 (baseline mortality rate):
All-ages population convention: National 25+-consistent correction factor ≈ — which is why the national figure is shown as a band.
GEMM is an upper-bound CRF:
Non-US remainder is off-map:
GEMM risk threshold:
Climate TRACE input-layer caveats:
Why this page exists:
VSL is illustrative: VSL = (2023 USD, EPA-anchored central value) — prefer a range around the central figure, never "cost of deaths" or "lives worth."
Cell mapping:
Source markers are grid cells, not individual plants: the neutral markers show aggregated source grid cells. That is a property of this page's data, not a withholding decision — the national payload behind it carries per-cell emissions and a count of units per cell, and no per-unit rows at all, so grid cell is the finest level this page can report. Per-plant detail for the Ohio Valley cluster is on the source map, where the payload has it.
No demographic or environmental-justice view — and why: there is zero demographic data on this box, so nothing on this page speaks to who bears the burden by race, income or vulnerability. Building that honestly would need (a) US Census/ACS race-and-income tables, (b) EPA EJScreen indicators, (c) CDC/ATSDR Social Vulnerability Index, and (d) a defensible spatial join from this variable-resolution receptor grid down to tract or block-group level — an area- or population-weighted (dasymetric) transfer, not a naive overlay. It would also need its own caveats: per-state y0 cannot resolve within-state mortality differences, so a naive version would understate real disparity, and attributing a group-level value to individuals is an ecological fallacy. Not attempted here rather than approximated.

More about this map

What the 100 km figure is counting
Why the two maps disagree

Map ① is risk per person: population-independent, and highest right at the sources, because the near-field is where an individual's odds change most.

Map ② is a count, so cell size matters: on this variable-resolution grid a cell can be ~100× larger than its neighbour, and a big rural cell paints a large dark area for the same count a small urban cell puts in a few pixels. Read the rate panel alongside it.

How this fits the national figure
The national figure this page is a view of
How big the model universe is
What lies beyond the 100 km ring